Comparison Overview
Rartel

Rartel
Str. Felix Iacob,Dr., 70, Bucuresti-Sector 1, Bucharest, RO
Last Update: 24/12/2025
RARTEL is a Romanian-Italian joint venture specialized in satellite services and applications. Based in Bucharest, it provides the Romanian and international corporate and institutional market with access to the entire Telespazio Group’s products and services portfolio....

L3 Technologies
600 Third Ave, New York, 10016, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
With headquarters in New York City and approximately 31,000 employees worldwide, L3 develops advanced defense technologies and commercial solutions in pilot training, aviation security, night vision and EO/IR, weapons, maritime systems and space. The company reported 20...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Rartel







L3 Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Rartel in 2026.
Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for L3 Technologies in 2026.
Incident History - Rartel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rartel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - L3 Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
L3 Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Rartel

L3 Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.