Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ransom-ISACRansom-ISAC
VS
HitachiHitachi
Ransom-ISAC

Ransom-ISAC

N/A

Last Update: 28/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://ransom-isac.org
100/1000Critical

Too often, vital intelligence is hoarded or hidden to protect commercial or reputational interests. This behaviour increases the time ransomware threats go undetected, reduces victim awareness, and hinders the global understanding of adversaries. Worse still, it can cau...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:6
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Hitachi

Hitachi

1-6-6, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, JP, 100-8280

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.hitachi.com
829/1000Good

For over 100 years, Hitachi has been committed to developing innovations that improve lives. Today, this means creating superior technology and products that balance environment, well-being, and economic growth. We integrate IT, operational technology (OT), and produc...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:37,613
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ransom-ISAC

Ransom-ISAC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hitachi

Hitachi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Ransom-ISAC has 36.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hitachi in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ransom-ISAC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ransom-ISAC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hitachi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hitachi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ransom-ISAC

Ransom-ISAC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CISRAN1790619887
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PTCRAN1784903272
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RAN1765563176
Hitachi

Hitachi

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SIEMOXMITHIT1774866497

FAQ

Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ransom-ISAC company and Hitachi company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ransom-ISAC and Hitachi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ransom-ISAC and Hitachi, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ransom-ISAC or Hitachi ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ransom-ISAC or Hitachi ?
Between Ransom-ISAC and Hitachi, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ransom-ISAC and Hitachi, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9