Comparison Overview

Rankiteo

VS

PayPal

Rankiteo

3790 El Camino Real, # 1174, Palo Alto, California, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

At Rankiteo, we offer two state-of-the-art platforms designed to address the critical challenges of cybersecurity and cyber risk assessment: Attack Surface Management Platform A powerful tool built to help organizations identify, assess, and monitor their cybersecurity vulnerabilities. With real-time insights and continuous protection, this platform ensures your digital infrastructure stays secure and resilient against potential threats. Proactively safeguard your organization by staying one step ahead of emerging risks. Underwriter Platform Specifically crafted for cyber insurance underwriters, this innovative solution provides deep, actionable insights into an organization's cybersecurity posture. By streamlining risk assessment and delivering data-driven intelligence, our platform empowers underwriters to make smarter decisions and gain a competitive edge in the evolving cyber insurance landscape. Together, these cutting-edge products enable businesses and insurance professionals to strengthen their security and optimize risk management strategies with confidence.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PayPal

2211 North First Street, San Jose, CA, US, 95131
Last Update: 2025-11-24

We're championing possibilities for all by making money fast, easy, and more enjoyable. Our hope is unlock opportunities for people in their everyday lives and empower the millions of people and businesses around the world who trust, rely, and use PayPal every day. For support, visit the PayPal Help Center. https://payp.al/help For employment opportunities, check out our job openings in the 'Jobs' tab. We're an equal opportunity employer that welcomes diversity, and offer generous benefits to help you thrive at work and in your free time.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 34,558
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rankiteo.jpeg
Rankiteo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
+
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification verified
verified
+
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification verified
verified
+
GDPR
GDPR certification verified
verified
+
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification verified
verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paypal.jpeg
PayPal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rankiteo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PayPal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rankiteo in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PayPal in 2025.

Incident History — Rankiteo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rankiteo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PayPal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PayPal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rankiteo.jpeg
Rankiteo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paypal.jpeg
PayPal
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Public Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Publicly Accessible Information
Motivation: Stalking, Trolling, Impersonation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Rankiteo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PayPal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

PayPal company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Rankiteo company has not reported any.

In the current year, PayPal company has reported more cyber incidents than Rankiteo company.

Neither PayPal company nor Rankiteo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

PayPal company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Rankiteo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

PayPal company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Rankiteo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rankiteo company nor PayPal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Rankiteo company holds more compliance certifications globally than PayPal company.

PayPal holds fewer compliance certifications than Rankiteo.

PayPal company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rankiteo company.

PayPal company employs more people globally than Rankiteo company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Rankiteo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Rankiteo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rankiteo nor PayPal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Rankiteo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rankiteo nor PayPal holds HIPAA certification.

Rankiteo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H