Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Randstad SwedenRandstad Sweden
VS
ManpowerManpower
Randstad Sweden

Randstad Sweden

Mathildatorget 3, Solna, 169 75, SE

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.randstad.se
763/1000Fair

Randstad är ett av världens största HR-serviceföretag med över 600 000 anställda i fler än 39 länder. Vi erbjuder lösningar inom bemanning, rekrytering och omställning . För dig som söker jobb erbjuder vi lediga tjänster inom i princip alla branscher och yrkesområden me...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:583
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Manpower

Manpower

100 Manpower Place, Milwaukee, WI, US, 53212

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.manpower.com
745/1000Moderate

Manpower is the global leader in contingent and permanent recruitment workforce solutions. We provide the agility businesses need with a continuum of staffing solutions. By leveraging our trusted brands, we have built a deeper talent pool to provide our clients access t...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:29,591
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Randstad Sweden

Randstad Sweden

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Manpower

Manpower

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Randstad Sweden in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Manpower in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Randstad Sweden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Randstad Sweden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Manpower (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Manpower cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Randstad Sweden

Randstad Sweden

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Manpower

Manpower

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAN501081325

FAQ

Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Randstad Sweden company and Manpower company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Randstad Sweden and Manpower, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Randstad Sweden and Manpower, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Randstad Sweden or Manpower ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Randstad Sweden or Manpower ?
Between Randstad Sweden and Manpower, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Randstad Sweden and Manpower, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3