Comparison Overview
Randstad Czech Republic

Randstad Czech Republic
Jungmannova 26/15, Praha 1, 110 00, CZ
Last Update: 25/11/2025
Randstad založil v roce 1960 v Nizozemí Frits Goldschmeding. V průběhu dalších let jsme se postupně rozšířili do 39 zemí a stali se největším poskytovatelem personálních služeb na světě. Cesta Randstadu v České republice začala v roce 2008, kdy jsme vstoupili na trh př...

Manpower
100 Manpower Place, Milwaukee, WI, US, 53212
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Manpower is the global leader in contingent and permanent recruitment workforce solutions. We provide the agility businesses need with a continuum of staffing solutions. By leveraging our trusted brands, we have built a deeper talent pool to provide our clients access t...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Randstad Czech Republic







Manpower






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Randstad Czech Republic in 2026.
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Manpower in 2026.
Incident History - Randstad Czech Republic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Randstad Czech Republic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Manpower (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Manpower cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Randstad Czech Republic

Manpower
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.