Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Randstad ChinaRandstad China
VS
The Adecco GroupThe Adecco Group
Randstad China

Randstad China

22nd Floor, 77 Mei Yuan Road, Shanghai, Shanghai, 200070, CN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.randstad.cn
754/1000Fair

Randstad is a global talent leader with the vision to be the world’s most equitable and specialised talent company. As a partner for talent and through our four specialisations - Operational, Professional, Digital and Enterprise - we provide clients with the high-qualit...

NAICS:541612
NAICS Definition:Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees:351
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The Adecco Group

The Adecco Group

Bellerivestrasse 30, Zurich, 8008, CH

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.adeccogroup.com
766/1000Fair

The Adecco Group is a world leading talent company. Our purpose is making the future work for everyone. Through our three global business units - Adecco, Akkodis and LHH - across 60 countries, we enable sustainable and lifelong employability for individuals, deliver dig...

NAICS:541612
NAICS Definition:Human Resources Consulting Services
Employees:22,339
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Randstad China

Randstad China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Adecco Group

The Adecco Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Randstad China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Human Resources Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Adecco Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Randstad China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Randstad China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Adecco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Adecco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Randstad China

Randstad China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The Adecco Group

The Adecco Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Randstad China company and The Adecco Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Randstad China and The Adecco Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Randstad China and The Adecco Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Randstad China or The Adecco Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Randstad China or The Adecco Group ?
Between Randstad China and The Adecco Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Randstad China and The Adecco Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES