Comparison Overview
Randstad Argentina

Randstad Argentina
Av. Carlos Pellegrini 1141, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, C1035AAR, AR
Last Update: 19/03/2026
En Randstad Argentina unimos demandas de trabajo con aspiraciones de crecer. Conectamos a las personas con las empresas que desarrollarán su potencial, contactamos a las empresas con las personas que las llevarán a un nivel más alto. Proveemos Soluciones Integrales en...

Randstad USA
3625 Cumberland Park, Blvd, Atlanta, GA, US, 30339
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Randstad North America, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Randstad N.V., the world's largest HR services provider. Driven to become the world's most valued 'working life partner', supporting as many people as possible in realizing their true potential throughout thei...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Randstad Argentina







Randstad USA






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Randstad Argentina in 2026.
Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Randstad USA in 2026.
Incident History - Randstad Argentina (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Randstad Argentina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Randstad USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Randstad USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Randstad Argentina

Randstad USA
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.