Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ramsey CountyRamsey County
VS
US Government Accountability OfficeUS Government Accountability Office
Ramsey County

Ramsey County

15 West Kellogg Blvd. , Saint Paul, 55102, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ramseycounty.us
749/1000Moderate

Ramsey County, home to Minnesota's state capital and more than 550,000 residents, is known for vibrant neighborhoods, parks and abundant family activities. Social policy: bit.ly/2e1y4Jm Ramsey County employs more than 4,000 people in full and part-time positions in a v...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:3,135
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

441 G Street, N.W., Washington, 20548, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.gao.gov
682/1000Weak

For more information about GAO, please visit www.gao.gov. General Information The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent, nonpartisan agency that works for Congress. Often called the "congressional watchdog,"​ GAO investigates how the federal go...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,303
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ramsey County

Ramsey County

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ramsey County in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

US Government Accountability Office has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Ramsey County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ramsey County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Government Accountability Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Government Accountability Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ramsey County

Ramsey County

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RAM22810423
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1773483893
🔒 Incident : Breach
US-FOR1772821514

FAQ

Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ramsey County company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ramsey County and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ramsey County and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ramsey County or US Government Accountability Office ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ramsey County or US Government Accountability Office ?
Between Ramsey County and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ramsey County and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA