Comparison Overview
Rakuten Advertising

Rakuten Advertising
800 Concar Dr., None, San Mateo, CA, US, 94402
Last Update: 19/02/2026
Rakuten Advertising leads the industry in delivering performance-driven marketing solutions that help the world’s top brands connect with unique, highly engaged audiences – from awareness to activation. At Rakuten, we outthink the competition and outperform your expect...

Booking.com
Oosterdokskade 163, Amsterdam, 1011 DL, NL
Last Update: 20/04/2026
A career at Booking.com is all about the journey, helping you explore new challenges in a place where you can be your best self. With plenty of exciting twists, turns and opportunities along the way. We’ve always been pioneers, on a mission to shape the future of trav...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Rakuten Advertising







Booking.com






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Rakuten Advertising in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Booking.com has 277.36% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Rakuten Advertising (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rakuten Advertising cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Booking.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Booking.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Rakuten Advertising

Booking.com
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.