Comparison Overview

Rakuten

VS

Grab

Rakuten

Rakuten Crimson House, 1-14-1 Tamagawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, JP, 158-0094
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://global.rakuten.com/corp/

Rakuten Group, Inc. (TSE: 4755) is a global technology leader in services that empower individuals, communities, businesses and society. Founded in Tokyo in 1997 as an online marketplace, Rakuten has expanded to offer services in e-commerce, fintech, digital content and communications to 2 billion members around the world. The Rakuten Group has more than 30,000 employees, and operations in 30 countries and regions. For more information visit https://global.rakuten.com/corp/.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,677
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Grab

3 Media Close, Grab HQ #01-03/06 , Singapore, Singapore, SG, 138498
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://grab.careers

Grab is Southeast Asia’s leading superapp, offering a suite of services consisting of deliveries, mobility, financial services, enterprise and others. Grabbers come from all over the world, and we are united by a common mission: to drive Southeast Asia forward by creating economic empowerment for everyone. At Grab, every Grabber is guided by The Grab Way, which explains our mission and the operating principles on how we can achieve it together. We call these principles the 4Hs: Heart We work together as OneGrab to serve communities in Southeast Asia Hunger We work to understand ground truths and drive improvements, big and small Honour We keep our word and steward our resources wisely to build and sustain trust Humility We are a constant work-in-progress, and we never stop learning to get better

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 52,680
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rakuten.jpeg
Rakuten
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grabapp.jpeg
Grab
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rakuten
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grab
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rakuten in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grab in 2025.

Incident History — Rakuten (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rakuten cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rakuten.jpeg
Rakuten
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Wrongdoing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grabapp.jpeg
Grab
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Grab company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rakuten company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rakuten company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Grab company has not reported any.

In the current year, Grab company and Rakuten company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grab company nor Rakuten company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Rakuten company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Grab company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Grab company nor Rakuten company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rakuten company nor Grab company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rakuten nor Grab holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rakuten company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Grab company.

Grab company employs more people globally than Rakuten company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Rakuten nor Grab holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rakuten nor Grab holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rakuten nor Grab holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rakuten nor Grab holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rakuten nor Grab holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rakuten nor Grab holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References