Comparison Overview

Rakuten

VS

DoorDash

Rakuten

Rakuten Crimson House, 1-14-1 Tamagawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, JP, 158-0094
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://global.rakuten.com/corp/

Rakuten Group, Inc. (TSE: 4755) is a global technology leader in services that empower individuals, communities, businesses and society. Founded in Tokyo in 1997 as an online marketplace, Rakuten has expanded to offer services in e-commerce, fintech, digital content and communications to 2 billion members around the world. The Rakuten Group has more than 30,000 employees, and operations in 30 countries and regions. For more information visit https://global.rakuten.com/corp/.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,677
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
View Profile

DoorDash

San Francisco, California, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 650 and 699
https://careersatdoordash.com/

At DoorDash, our mission to empower local economies shapes how our team members move quickly and always learn and reiterate to support merchants, Dashers and the communities we serve. We are a technology and logistics company that started with door-to-door delivery, and we are looking for team members who can help us go from a company that is known for delivering food to a company that people turn to for any and all goods. DoorDash is growing rapidly and changing constantly, which gives our team members the opportunity to share their unique perspectives, solve new challenges, and own their careers. Our leaders seek the truth and welcome big, hairy, audacious questions. We are grounded in our company values, and we make intentional decisions that are both logical and display empathy for our range of users—from Dashers to Merchants to Customers.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 74,124
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rakuten.jpeg
Rakuten
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doordash.jpeg
DoorDash
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rakuten
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DoorDash
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rakuten in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

DoorDash has 426.32% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Rakuten (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rakuten cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DoorDash (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DoorDash cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rakuten.jpeg
Rakuten
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Wrongdoing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doordash.jpeg
DoorDash
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Vendor Compromise, Credential Theft, Social Engineering
Motivation: Data Theft, Potential Fraud Enablement
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (Employee Targeted)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Phishing (Spear Phishing/Vishing), Compromised Credentials
Motivation: Data Theft for Follow-on Attacks (e.g., Spear Phishing, Vishing), Potential Financial Gain via Stolen Data
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Rakuten company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DoorDash company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

DoorDash company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Rakuten company.

In the current year, DoorDash company has reported more cyber incidents than Rakuten company.

Neither DoorDash company nor Rakuten company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both DoorDash company and Rakuten company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither DoorDash company nor Rakuten company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

DoorDash company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Rakuten company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rakuten nor DoorDash holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Rakuten company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DoorDash company.

DoorDash company employs more people globally than Rakuten company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Rakuten nor DoorDash holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rakuten nor DoorDash holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rakuten nor DoorDash holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rakuten nor DoorDash holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rakuten nor DoorDash holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rakuten nor DoorDash holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References