Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rakuten ChinaRakuten China
VS
TietoTieto
Rakuten China

Rakuten China

undefined, Beijing, Beijing, 100027, CN

Last Update: 20/12/2025

View Profile
766/1000Fair

Rakuten, Inc. (TSE's first section: 4755) is the largest ecommerce company in Japan, and third largest ecommerce marketplace company worldwide. Rakuten provides a variety of consumer and business-focused services including e-commerce, e-reading, travel, banking, securit...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:26
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tieto

Tieto

N/A

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.tieto.com/
742/1000Moderate

Tieto provides customers across different industries with mission-critical solutions through its specialized software businesses Tieto Caretech, Tieto Banktech and Tieto Indtech as well as Tieto Tech Consulting business. The company's around 13 000 talented vertical sof...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:12,209
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rakuten China

Rakuten China

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tieto

Tieto

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rakuten China in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tieto in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rakuten China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rakuten China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tieto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tieto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rakuten China

Rakuten China

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tieto

Tieto

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TIE722080425

FAQ

Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rakuten China company and Tieto company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rakuten China and Tieto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rakuten China and Tieto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rakuten China or Tieto ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rakuten China or Tieto ?
Between Rakuten China and Tieto, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rakuten China and Tieto, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3