Comparison Overview
Rakuten China
Rakuten China
undefined, Beijing, Beijing, 100027, CN
Last Update: 20/12/2025
Rakuten, Inc. (TSE's first section: 4755) is the largest ecommerce company in Japan, and third largest ecommerce marketplace company worldwide. Rakuten provides a variety of consumer and business-focused services including e-commerce, e-reading, travel, banking, securit...
Flipkart
Flipkart Internet Private Limited, Buildings Alyssa, Begonia & Clove Embassy Tech Village, Outer Ring Road, Devarabeesanahalli Village, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560103
Last Update: 01/04/2026
At Flipkart, we're driven by our purpose of empowering every Indian's dream by delivering value through innovation in technology and commerce. With a customer base of over 350 million, product coverage of over 150 million across 80+ categories, a focus on generating dir...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Rakuten China
Flipkart
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Rakuten China in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
Flipkart has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Rakuten China (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rakuten China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Flipkart (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Flipkart cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Rakuten China
Flipkart
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.