Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rakuten Blockchain LabRakuten Blockchain Lab
VS
MastercardMastercard
Rakuten Blockchain Lab

Rakuten Blockchain Lab

Alexander House, Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT2 8HD, GB

Last Update: 02/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://rakuten.careers/
749/1000Moderate

This is the homepage for the Rakuten Blockchain Lab. We are a software engineering team founded in 2016 as part of the Japanese headquartered Rakuten, Inc. (TSE: 4755) which is a global leader in internet services. Our team members are based in Belfast, Tokyo and Bang...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:18
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mastercard

Mastercard

2000 Purchase St, Purchase, NY, US, 10577

Last Update: 16/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mastercard.com
833/1000Good

Mastercard powers economies and empowers people in 200+ countries and territories worldwide. Together with our customers, we’re building a sustainable economy where everyone can prosper. We support a wide range of digital payments choices, making transactions secure, si...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:46,686
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rakuten Blockchain Lab

Rakuten Blockchain Lab

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mastercard

Mastercard

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rakuten Blockchain Lab in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mastercard in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rakuten Blockchain Lab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rakuten Blockchain Lab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mastercard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mastercard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rakuten Blockchain Lab

Rakuten Blockchain Lab

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mastercard

Mastercard

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MAS05510423

FAQ

Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab company and Mastercard company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab and Mastercard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab and Mastercard, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rakuten Blockchain Lab or Mastercard ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rakuten Blockchain Lab or Mastercard ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab and Mastercard, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rakuten Blockchain Lab and Mastercard, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8