Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rajasthan RoyalsRajasthan Royals
VS
Major League Baseball (MLB)Major League Baseball (MLB)
Rajasthan Royals

Rajasthan Royals

103-104, B-Wing, Fulcrum, Hiranandani Business Park, Sahar Airport Rd, Andheri East, Mumbai, Maharashtra , 400099, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

Champions of the inaugural IPL season (2008), finalists of the 2013 Champions League T20 and the 2022 IPL season, Rajasthan Royals are a cricket franchise from the state of Rajasthan, India, with the Sawai Mansingh Stadium in Jaipur being our home ground. At the Royals...

NAICS:711
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:375
Subsidiaries:47
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Major League Baseball (MLB)

Major League Baseball (MLB)

1271 Sixth Avenue, New York, New York, US, 10020

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.mlb.com
664/1000Weak

Major League Baseball (MLB) is the most historic professional sports league in the United States and consists of 30 member clubs in the U.S. and Canada, representing the highest level of professional baseball. Led by Commissioner Robert D. Manfred, Jr., MLB remains com...

NAICS:7112
NAICS Definition:Spectator Sports
Employees:34,698
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rajasthan Royals

Rajasthan Royals

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Major League Baseball (MLB)

Major League Baseball (MLB)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Spectator Sports Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rajasthan Royals in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Spectator Sports Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Major League Baseball (MLB) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rajasthan Royals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rajasthan Royals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Major League Baseball (MLB) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Major League Baseball (MLB) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rajasthan Royals

Rajasthan Royals

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Major League Baseball (MLB)

Major League Baseball (MLB)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAJ2393723092425
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAJ000083124

FAQ

Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rajasthan Royals company and Major League Baseball (MLB) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rajasthan Royals and Major League Baseball (MLB), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rajasthan Royals and Major League Baseball (MLB), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rajasthan Royals or Major League Baseball (MLB) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rajasthan Royals or Major League Baseball (MLB) ?
Between Rajasthan Royals and Major League Baseball (MLB), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rajasthan Royals and Major League Baseball (MLB), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA