Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rain Bird CorporationRain Bird Corporation
VS
HenkelHenkel
Rain Bird Corporation

Rain Bird Corporation

1000 W. Sierra Madre Avenue, Azusa, California, US, 91702

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.rainbird.com
695/1000Weak

Rain Bird Corporation, based in Azusa, California is the world's leading manufacturer and provider of irrigation products and services. Since 1933, Rain Bird has offered the broadest range of irrigation and water conservation products for farms, golf courses, sports ar...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:1,195
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Henkel

Henkel

Henkelstraße 67, Düsseldorf, 40589, DE

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.henkel.com
812/1000Good

Henkel operates worldwide with leading innovations, brands and technologies in two business areas: Adhesive Technologies and Consumer Brands. Founded in 1876, Henkel looks back on more than 145 years of success. The company holds leading positions with its two business...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:40,867
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rain Bird Corporation

Rain Bird Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Henkel

Henkel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rain Bird Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Henkel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rain Bird Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rain Bird Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Henkel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Henkel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rain Bird Corporation

Rain Bird Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RAI1765556797
Henkel

Henkel

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation company and Henkel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation and Henkel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation and Henkel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rain Bird Corporation or Henkel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rain Bird Corporation or Henkel ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation and Henkel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rain Bird Corporation and Henkel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3