Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rackspace TechnologyRackspace Technology
VS
WiproWipro
Rackspace Technology

Rackspace Technology

19122 US Highway 281 N, San Antonio, 78258, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.rackspace.com
393/1000Critical

Rackspace Technology® is the operator of the full enterprise AI stack from governed private cloud to AI inference and agents in production. With an Outcomes-as-a-Service model built on secure infrastructure, data foundations and forward-deployed engineering, we deliver ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:6,846
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Wipro

Wipro

Doddakannelli, Sarjapur Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560035

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wipro.com
789/1000Fair

Wipro Limited (NYSE: WIT, BSE: 507685, NSE: WIPRO) is a leading AI-powered technology services and consulting company focused on building innovative solutions that address clients’ most complex digital transformation needs. Leveraging our consulting-led approach and the...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:261,249
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rackspace Technology

Rackspace Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wipro

Wipro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rackspace Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wipro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rackspace Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rackspace Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wipro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wipro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rackspace Technology

Rackspace Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RAC421060625
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RAC3384923
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RAC02841222
Wipro

Wipro

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rackspace Technology company and Wipro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rackspace Technology and Wipro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rackspace Technology and Wipro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rackspace Technology or Wipro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rackspace Technology or Wipro ?
Between Rackspace Technology and Wipro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rackspace Technology and Wipro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA