Comparison Overview

R.A Jones

VS

John Deere

R.A Jones

2701 Crescent Springs Road Covington, Kentucky 41017, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rajones.com

R.A Jones is one of the world’s leading providers of primary and secondary packaging machinery to the food, pharmaceutical, dairy and consumer goods industries. The company holds more than 70 worldwide patents across seven machinery brands, covering a wide range of solutions from improving shelf life of fresh meats to efficient filling of pouches, cups and bottles, as well as aerosol production and creative carton construction. The North American resources include four manufacturing plants and more than 800 US-based staff members. Brands that are part of the R.A Jones portfolio include: KartridgPak, Autoprod, Holmatic, Aerofill, Dawson and Map Systems, as well as Jones, our namesake brand. R.A Jones is part of Coesia, a group of innovation-based, industrial solutions companies, operating globally and headquartered in Bologna, Italy.

NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition: Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 501-1,000
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

John Deere

undefined, Moline, IL, 61265, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 849
http://www.deere.com/AboutUs

It doesn’t matter if you’ve never driven a tractor, mowed a lawn, or operated a dozer. With John Deere’s role in helping produce food, fiber, fuel, and infrastructure, we work for every single person on the planet. It all started nearly 200 years ago with a steel plow. Today, John Deere drives innovation in agriculture, construction, forestry, turf, power systems, and more.

NAICS: 333
NAICS Definition: Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 50,667
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ra-jones.jpeg
R.A Jones
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-deere.jpeg
John Deere
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
R.A Jones
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
John Deere
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R.A Jones in 2025.

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John Deere in 2025.

Incident History — R.A Jones (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R.A Jones cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — John Deere (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John Deere cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ra-jones.jpeg
R.A Jones
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-deere.jpeg
John Deere
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

John Deere company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to R.A Jones company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, John Deere company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to R.A Jones company.

In the current year, John Deere company and R.A Jones company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither John Deere company nor R.A Jones company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither John Deere company nor R.A Jones company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither John Deere company nor R.A Jones company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither R.A Jones company nor John Deere company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither R.A Jones nor John Deere holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither R.A Jones company nor John Deere company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

John Deere company employs more people globally than R.A Jones company, reflecting its scale as a Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither R.A Jones nor John Deere holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither R.A Jones nor John Deere holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither R.A Jones nor John Deere holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither R.A Jones nor John Deere holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither R.A Jones nor John Deere holds HIPAA certification.

Neither R.A Jones nor John Deere holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The Bold Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘percentage’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.4.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The ComboServlet in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.2, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.5, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not limit the number or size of the files it will combine, which allows remote attackers to create very large responses that lead to a denial of service attack via the URL query string.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and create arbitrary directories on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A relative path traversal vulnerability was discovered in Productivity Suite software version 4.4.1.19. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to interact with the ProductivityService PLC simulator and delete arbitrary files on the target machine.

Published
Date
2025-10-23
Updated
Date
2025-10-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References