Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

R.A Jones, a Coesia companyR.A Jones, a Coesia company
VS
Atlas CopcoAtlas Copco
R.A Jones, a Coesia company

R.A Jones, a Coesia company

2701 Crescent Springs Road, Covington, Kentucky, US, 41017

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rajones.com
747/1000Moderate

R.A Jones is one of the world’s leading providers of primary and secondary packaging machinery to the food, pharmaceutical, dairy and consumer goods industries. The company holds more than 70 worldwide patents across seven machinery brands, covering a wide range of solu...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:472
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Atlas Copco

Atlas Copco

Sickla Industriväg 19, Stockholm, SE, 131 54

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Atlas Copco delivers innovative products and solutions that help businesses grow and drive progress. Our portfolio spans compressed air and gas systems and treatment, vacuum solutions, industrial power tools, assembly systems, and power and flow solutions. We bring a ...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:35,258
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
R.A Jones, a Coesia company

R.A Jones, a Coesia company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atlas Copco

Atlas Copco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for R.A Jones, a Coesia company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Copco in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - R.A Jones, a Coesia company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

R.A Jones, a Coesia company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atlas Copco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Copco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
R.A Jones, a Coesia company

R.A Jones, a Coesia company

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Atlas Copco

Atlas Copco

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company company and Atlas Copco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company and Atlas Copco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company and Atlas Copco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - R.A Jones, a Coesia company or Atlas Copco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - R.A Jones, a Coesia company or Atlas Copco ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company and Atlas Copco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between R.A Jones, a Coesia company and Atlas Copco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66591
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.39.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-66589
SUMMARY

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Kings Plugins B2BKing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects B2BKing: from n/a through 5.2.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-27365
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Series allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PublishPress Series: from n/a through 2.17.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-73974
SUMMARY

linuxfabrik-lib provides Python modules for database access, caching, shell execution, and API integrations, and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins uses its shared testing helper across check plugins. Prior to linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0, lib.lftest.test() treated the first or second element of a --test CSV argument as a filesystem path and returned the file contents as simulated standard output or standard error without path confinement. The hidden but production-accessible --test argument was accepted by sudo-authorized plugins, so an attacker controlling the nagios or icinga account could use check-plugins/deb-updates/deb-updates with its default QUERY=1 to disclose every line of a root-readable file. Approximately 22 other plugins exposed filtered content or a root file existence and readability oracle through the same helper, while check-plugins/network-bonding/network-bonding and check-plugins/openstack-swift-stat/openstack-swift-stat had direct read paths that bypassed the helper. The library fix confines fixture reads to the invoking plugin's unit-test directory and refuses unsafe anchors, and the plugin fix routes the two bypasses through that helper. These issues are fixed in linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-73973
SUMMARY

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins provides monitoring plugins for Icinga, Nagios, and related systems. Prior to version 7.0.0, check-plugins/logfile/logfile accepted a free-form --filename path and opened it as root when invoked through the shipped nagios or icinga sudoers allowlist, without confining the resolved path to /var/log. An attacker who controls the monitoring account can select a root-readable file such as /etc/shadow and use --warning-regex . while leaving SUPPRESS_OUTPUT false, causing each nonempty line to be collected in warn_matches and returned through lib.base.oao(). The vulnerable flow passes the expanded scan_path directly to open(), and neither real-path containment nor an allowlist protects the sink. The same fix also confines mysql-logfile and openvpn-client-list paths, allows only documented log roots, and resolves symlinks and parent-directory traversal before checking containment. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8