Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

QUT LawQUT Law
VS
Universidad Complutense de MadridUniversidad Complutense de Madrid
QUT Law

QUT Law

2 George St, Brisbane City, 4000, AU

Last Update: 14/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://linktr.ee/qutbuslaw
772/1000Fair

QUT is preparing our students to adapt and respond to a disrupted legal services market, with up-to-date courses and skills to succeed in a diverse range of careers. TEQSA PRV12079 | CRICOS No. 00213J

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Ciudad Universitaria, Madrid, Madrid, 28040, ES

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.ucm.es/
807/1000Good

La Universidad Complutense de Madrid es una universidad pública de calidad al servicio de la sociedad. Sus estudiantes son el eje principal de su actividad por ello, la UCM apuesta por una formación integral y crítica del más alto nivel. Su oferta para el curso 2016...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,559
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
QUT Law

QUT Law

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QUT Law in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universidad Complutense de Madrid in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - QUT Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QUT Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Universidad Complutense de Madrid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universidad Complutense de Madrid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
QUT Law

QUT Law

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between QUT Law company and Universidad Complutense de Madrid company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between QUT Law and Universidad Complutense de Madrid, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between QUT Law and Universidad Complutense de Madrid, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - QUT Law or Universidad Complutense de Madrid ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - QUT Law or Universidad Complutense de Madrid ?
Between QUT Law and Universidad Complutense de Madrid, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between QUT Law and Universidad Complutense de Madrid, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2