Comparison Overview
QUT Engineering, Architecture and Built Environment

QUT Engineering, Architecture and Built Environment
2 George Street, Brisbane, 4000, AU
Last Update: 25/03/2026
QUT’s Faculty of Engineering is designing solutions for a smarter, more sustainable future through engineering, architecture, and built environment study areas. With innovative learning spaces, strong industry connections and world-leading research, our graduates are ...

Department of Education, Western Australia
151 Royal Street, East Perth, Western Australia, AU, 6004
Last Update: 30/03/2026
A strong education system is the cornerstone of every successful society. The Department of Education provides high quality education for children and young people throughout Western Australia, helping them reach their full potential. Visit our website to discover more...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

QUT Engineering, Architecture and Built Environment







Department of Education, Western Australia






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for QUT Engineering, Architecture and Built Environment in 2026.
Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Department of Education, Western Australia in 2026.
Incident History - QUT Engineering, Architecture and Built Environment (X = Date, Y = Severity)
QUT Engineering, Architecture and Built Environment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Department of Education, Western Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Department of Education, Western Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

QUT Engineering, Architecture and Built Environment

Department of Education, Western Australia
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.