Comparison Overview
Quinn Emanuel

Quinn Emanuel
865 S Figueroa St, Los Angeles, US
Last Update: 04/09/2026
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP is a 1100+ lawyer business litigation firm—the largest in the world devoted solely to business litigation and arbitration.

DLA Piper
Global, GB
Last Update: 08/10/2026
DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver excepti...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Quinn Emanuel







DLA Piper






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)
Quinn Emanuel has 30.07% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DLA Piper in 2026.
Incident History - Quinn Emanuel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Quinn Emanuel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DLA Piper (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DLA Piper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Quinn Emanuel

DLA Piper
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.