Comparison Overview
Quest Diagnostics BioPharma Services

Quest Diagnostics BioPharma Services
500 Plaza Drive, Secaucus, NJ, US, 07094
Last Update: 02/04/2026
When you choose Quest Diagnostics as your partner in BioPharma Services, you get more than lab testing. From development of companion diagnostics and clinical trial testing to successful commercialization of your innovative solutions, we’re here to help you hit every m...

Erasmus MC
Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, NL, 3015 GD
Last Update: 03/04/2026
We are Erasmus MC. Our roots lie in Rotterdam, a city and port of international standing. We are the most innovative university medical center in the Netherlands and one of the world’s leading centers of scientific research. We are committed to achieving a healthy popul...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Quest Diagnostics BioPharma Services







Erasmus MC






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Quest Diagnostics BioPharma Services in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Erasmus MC in 2026.
Incident History - Quest Diagnostics BioPharma Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Quest Diagnostics BioPharma Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Erasmus MC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Erasmus MC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Quest Diagnostics BioPharma Services

Erasmus MC
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.
Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.
Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.