Comparison Overview
QUT (Queensland University of Technology)
QUT (Queensland University of Technology)
2 George Street, Brisbane 4000, Brisbane, Queensland, AU, 4000
Last Update: 23/04/2026
QUT (Queensland University of Technology) is a highly successful Australian university with an applied emphasis in courses and research. Based in Brisbane, the university has a global outlook, some 50,000 students, including 9000 from overseas, and an annual budget of m...
University of California, Davis
1 Shields Ave, Davis, California, US, 95616
Last Update: 05/04/2026
UC Davis was founded in 1908 to serve the state of California. We do and we always will. Today, that seed planted years ago has grown into one of the world’s top universities. UC Davis has a community of faculty and staff who are leading the way in teaching, research, ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
QUT (Queensland University of Technology)
University of California, Davis
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for QUT (Queensland University of Technology) in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
University of California, Davis has 90.48% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - QUT (Queensland University of Technology) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
QUT (Queensland University of Technology) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of California, Davis (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of California, Davis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
QUT (Queensland University of Technology)
University of California, Davis
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in Comfast CF-WR631AX V3 up to 2.7.0.8. Affected by this vulnerability is the function system_wl_upload_pic_file of the file /usr/bin/webmgnt of the component FastCGI Backend. This manipulation of the argument filename causes os command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A vulnerability was found in Leantime up to 3.8.0. Affected is the function Setting::saveSetting of the component API. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A vulnerability has been found in Leantime up to 3.8.0. This impacts the function editUser/addUser of the component JSON-RPC Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument role leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A flaw has been found in Helicone ai-gateway up to 0.2.0-beta.30. This affects the function build_target_url of the file ai-gateway/src/dispatcher/service.rs of the component AWS Metadata Service. Executing a manipulation of the argument extracted_path_and_query can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A vulnerability was detected in coollabsio Coolify up to 4.1.1. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /app/Policies/ of the component Policy Handler. Performing a manipulation results in missing authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used.