Comparison Overview
QUT (Queensland University of Technology)

QUT (Queensland University of Technology)
2 George Street, Brisbane 4000, Brisbane, Queensland, AU, 4000
Last Update: 23/04/2026
QUT (Queensland University of Technology) is a highly successful Australian university with an applied emphasis in courses and research. Based in Brisbane, the university has a global outlook, some 50,000 students, including 9000 from overseas, and an annual budget of m...

Harvard University
30 Dunster St, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, 02138
Last Update: 24/06/2026
Harvard University is devoted to excellence in teaching, learning, and research, and to developing leaders in many disciplines who make a difference globally. Founded in 1636, Harvard is the oldest institution of higher learning in the United States. The official flags...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

QUT (Queensland University of Technology)







Harvard University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for QUT (Queensland University of Technology) in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
Harvard University has 661.9% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - QUT (Queensland University of Technology) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
QUT (Queensland University of Technology) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Harvard University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Harvard University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

QUT (Queensland University of Technology)

Harvard University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.
JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/3ea9cad8699714dc072fade29d36be0d1e23d708
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/733eb353dca7b0ea0252e724445b6defa29c393e
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/86b7ba7801988aadb1a67555629522a71d603bd3
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/pull/2000
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.0.16
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.2.1
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/security/advisories/GHSA-2r2c-cx56-8933
JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/0389f0ee6d0375901b602671ad5dafd4d1d4ee09
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/4ee3a73849ffb9a85ec748e4e8cd8f6d81f84f40
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/934f09e6128cee33c2b13d42b6e859c1ee2d194b
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/pull/2000
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/pull/2001
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.0.16
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.2.1
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/jline-3.30.14
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/security/advisories/GHSA-47qp-hqvx-6r3f
Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.