Comparison Overview
Queensland Communications

Queensland Communications
36 Eagleview Place, Eagle Farm, 4009, AU
Last Update: 14/04/2026
If you’re a leader in your field, you need to make strong decisions, be accountable and deliver on your promises. Queensland Communications gives you the visibility to understand your terrain and the tools to communicate with clarity. Our two way radio systems and infr...

e& Egypt
Fifth Setlment, Cairo, EG, 12411
Last Update: 31/03/2026
Building on 17 years of technology excellence in the Egyptian market, and in our relentless quest to bring you more and better services, etisalat by e& in Egypt has now evolved into the digital telco of the future. Covering and serving 99% of the inhabited areas in Eg...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Queensland Communications







e& Egypt






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
Queensland Communications has 46.52% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for e& Egypt in 2026.
Incident History - Queensland Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Queensland Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - e& Egypt (X = Date, Y = Severity)
e& Egypt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Queensland Communications

e& Egypt
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.