Comparison Overview
Queens College

Queens College
65-30 Kissena Blvd, Queens, ny, 11367-1597, US
Last Update: 19/03/2026
Queens College: Building Futures for Over 85 Years With more than 170 undergraduate and graduate programs, Queens College appears annually in the Princeton Review’s America’s Best Colleges because of our exceptional academics, affordability, and diversity. Indeed, our ...

Deakin University
221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, victoria, AU, 3125
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Deakin’s unique identity – rooted in balanced excellence in education and research – has been driving lasting change for a better future since 1974. Over our 50+ year history, Deakin has grown to be one of the top universities worldwide with a truly global presence. Our...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Queens College







Deakin University






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Queens College in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Deakin University in 2026.
Incident History - Queens College (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Queens College cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Deakin University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Deakin University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Queens College

Deakin University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.