Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

QuantumBlack, AI by McKinseyQuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey
VS
TELUS DigitalTELUS Digital
QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey

QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey

undefined, Global, undefined, undefined, GB

Last Update: 01/05/2026

View Profile

We are QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey. We bring the power of Artificial Intelligence combined with the unique strengths of people, to create a new source of dynamic, competitive advantage we call hybrid intelligence. QuantumBlack was born and proven in Formula 1, where...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:565
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TELUS Digital

TELUS Digital

510 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, V6B 0M3, CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
543/1000Critical

TELUS Digital crafts unique and enduring experiences for customers and employees, and creates future-focused digital transformations that stand the test of time. We are the brand behind the brands. Our global team members are both passionate ambassadors of our clients’ ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:39,811
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey

QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TELUS Digital

TELUS Digital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

TELUS Digital has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TELUS Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TELUS Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey

QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TELUS Digital

TELUS Digital

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TEL1773419339
🔒 Incident : Breach
TEL1773332910
🔒 Incident : Breach
CRUTEL1774405474

FAQ

Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey company and TELUS Digital company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey and TELUS Digital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey and TELUS Digital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey or TELUS Digital ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey or TELUS Digital ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey and TELUS Digital, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between QuantumBlack, AI by McKinsey and TELUS Digital, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9