Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦
VS
ASUSASUS
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, TW

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.quantatw.com
739/1000Moderate

Established in 1988, Quanta Computer is the largest notebook computer ODM company in the world. With leading technology and strong R&D capability, Quanta has become a leader in hi-tech markets and the best partner providing quality design and manufacturing services to t...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:9,677
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
ASUS

ASUS

No.15, Lide Road, Taipei City, 112, TW

Last Update: 23/05/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.asus.com
541/1000Critical

ASUS is a global technology leader delivering incredible experiences that enhance the lives of people everywhere. World renowned for continuously reimagining today’s technologies for tomorrow, ASUS puts users first In Search of Incredible to provide the world’s most inn...

NAICS:3341
NAICS Definition:Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:16,975
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ASUS

ASUS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

ASUS has 277.36% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ASUS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ASUS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
QUA15716222
ASUS

ASUS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ASU1779539103
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DIETOYFILASUCITBENMAGLINYAMFIATHEBAN1774023969
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ASU1770130670

FAQ

Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 company and ASUS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 and ASUS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 and ASUS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 or ASUS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 or ASUS ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 and ASUS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 and ASUS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA