Comparison Overview
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦
undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, TW
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Established in 1988, Quanta Computer is the largest notebook computer ODM company in the world. With leading technology and strong R&D capability, Quanta has become a leader in hi-tech markets and the best partner providing quality design and manufacturing services to t...

ASUS
No.15, Lide Road, Taipei City, 112, TW
Last Update: 22/07/2026
ASUS is a global technology leader delivering incredible experiences that enhance the lives of people everywhere. World renowned for continuously reimagining today’s technologies for tomorrow, ASUS puts users first In Search of Incredible to provide the world’s most inn...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦







ASUS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 in 2026.
Incidents vs Computer Hardware Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
ASUS has 385.44% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ASUS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ASUS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Quanta Computer Inc. 廣達電腦

ASUS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.