Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

QualcommQualcomm
VS
Microchip Technology Inc.Microchip Technology Inc.
Qualcomm

Qualcomm

Qualcomm, San Diego, 92121, US

Last Update: 06/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.qualcomm.com/
794/1000Fair

Inspired by 250 years of American ingenuity, we build technologies that expand what’s possible. From wireless to AI at scale and 6G, our innovations power progress worldwide.

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:57,635
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
Microchip Technology Inc.

Microchip Technology Inc.

Chandler, AZ, US

Last Update: 26/05/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.microchip.com/
597/1000Very Poor

Microchip Technology Inc. is a leading semiconductor supplier of smart, connected and secure embedded control solutions. Its easy-to-use development tools and comprehensive product portfolio enable customers to create optimal designs which reduce risk while lowering tot...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:17,217
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Qualcomm

Qualcomm

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Microchip Technology Inc.

Microchip Technology Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Qualcomm has 18.03% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Microchip Technology Inc. has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Qualcomm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Qualcomm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Microchip Technology Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microchip Technology Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Qualcomm

Qualcomm

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TATQUA1782477239
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
QUAAND1772563499
🔒 Incident : Breach
TATTSMQUA1782491371
Microchip Technology Inc.

Microchip Technology Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MYPMIC1779819824
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MIC742060625
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MIC740060625

FAQ

Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Qualcomm company and Microchip Technology Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Qualcomm and Microchip Technology Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Qualcomm and Microchip Technology Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Qualcomm or Microchip Technology Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Qualcomm or Microchip Technology Inc. ?
Between Qualcomm and Microchip Technology Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Qualcomm and Microchip Technology Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9