Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

QBE SMEQBE SME
VS
Bajaj General InsuranceBajaj General Insurance
QBE SME

QBE SME

Stafford, ST16 2AX, GB

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

We actively work with insurance brokers to create innovative solutions that fit the needs of small and medium-sized businesses. Our SME insurance products cover property, casualty, motor and specialist lines. As a business insurance specialist, we have the experience, ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bajaj General Insurance

Bajaj General Insurance

Yerawada, Bajaj Insurance House, Pune, Maharastra, IN, 411006

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

Bajaj General Insurance Limited (formerly known as Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited) is one of India’s leading, most trusted and dynamic private general insurance companies. It is a subsidiary of Bajaj Finserv Limited, India’s leading and most diversified...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:17,321
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
QBE SME

QBE SME

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bajaj General Insurance

Bajaj General Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for QBE SME in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bajaj General Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - QBE SME (X = Date, Y = Severity)

QBE SME cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bajaj General Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bajaj General Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
QBE SME

QBE SME

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bajaj General Insurance

Bajaj General Insurance

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between QBE SME company and Bajaj General Insurance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between QBE SME and Bajaj General Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between QBE SME and Bajaj General Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - QBE SME or Bajaj General Insurance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - QBE SME or Bajaj General Insurance ?
Between QBE SME and Bajaj General Insurance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between QBE SME and Bajaj General Insurance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2