Comparison Overview
Qatar Design Consortium

Qatar Design Consortium
Al Jabor Traders Building, Building No. 238 (PO Box 5171), Doha, undefined, 5171, QA
Last Update: 05/01/2026
An A Grade Engineering Consultancy Firm -- Qatar Design Consortium provides consultancy services in Architecture, Civil & Structural Engineering, Building Engineering Services, Quantity Surveying, Energy and Utility Engineering, Transportation Engineering Services, Cons...

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)
Building 3, Courtyard 5, Anding Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, CN
Last Update: 11/04/2026
China State Construction Engineering Corporation Ltd (in short: China Construction; Stock code: 601668), formally established on December 10, 2007, was co-initiated by four Fortune Global 500 enterprises: China State Construction Engineering Corp. (CSCEC), China Nationa...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Qatar Design Consortium







CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Qatar Design Consortium in 2026.
Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) in 2026.
Incident History - Qatar Design Consortium (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Qatar Design Consortium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Qatar Design Consortium

CHINA STATE CONSTRUCTION (CSCEC)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.