Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

資誠 (PwC Taiwan)資誠 (PwC Taiwan)
VS
AccentureAccenture
資誠 (PwC Taiwan)

資誠 (PwC Taiwan)

台北市基隆路一段333號27樓, undefined, undefined, undefined, TW

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pwc.tw
756/1000Fair

資誠(PwC Taiwan)由朱國璋及陳振銑教授於1970年所創立,持續追求卓越,堅持正直誠信及維持高品質的專業素養,並善盡企業責任促進變革以贏得公眾信賴。近五十年來伴隨台灣經濟發展業務不斷蓬勃成長。 資誠(PwC Taiwan)係PwC在台灣之聯盟所,我們的使命是「營造社會誠信,解決重要問題」。 PwC的全球聯盟組織遍佈156個國家及區域,計有逾295,000名專業人員在世界各地致力於提供高品質的審計、稅務及顧問諮詢服務。在台灣,資誠聯合會計師事務所偕同策略合作夥伴(資誠企業管理顧問公司、資誠稅務諮詢顧問公司、普華國際財務顧問公司...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:962
Subsidiaries:79
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Accenture

Accenture

Grand Canal Harbour, Dublin 2, IE

Last Update: 12/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.accenture.com
661/1000Weak

Accenture helps the world’s leading enterprises reinvent by building their digital core and unleashing the power of AI to create value at speed for organizations across industries. Our strategy is to be the reinvention partner of choice for our clients and lead in the s...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:690,859
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
資誠 (PwC Taiwan)

資誠 (PwC Taiwan)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Accenture

Accenture

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Accenture has 188.46% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

資誠 (PwC Taiwan) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Accenture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accenture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
資誠 (PwC Taiwan)

資誠 (PwC Taiwan)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Accenture

Accenture

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ACC1783556620
🔒 Incident : Breach
ACC1783463023
🔒 Incident : Breach
ACC1783859045

FAQ

Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) company and Accenture company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) and Accenture, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) and Accenture, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) or Accenture ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) or Accenture ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) and Accenture, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 資誠 (PwC Taiwan) and Accenture, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8