Comparison Overview
PwC US Consumer Markets
PwC US Consumer Markets
N/A
Last Update: 31/03/2026
PwC’s Consumer Markets team brings together industry expertise, proprietary research, and real-world perspective to decode the shifts redefining how people shop, live, and connect. We help companies move at the speed of culture—as consumer desires are being reprogrammed...
Grant Thornton (US)
171 N. Clark Street, Suite 200, Chicago, IL, US, 60601
Last Update: 02/04/2026
In the US, Grant Thornton LLP and Grant Thornton Advisors LLC (and their respective subsidiary entities) practice as an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations and professional standards. G...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
PwC US Consumer Markets
Grant Thornton (US)
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PwC US Consumer Markets in 2026.
Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Grant Thornton (US) in 2026.
Incident History - PwC US Consumer Markets (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PwC US Consumer Markets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Grant Thornton (US) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Grant Thornton (US) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
PwC US Consumer Markets
Grant Thornton (US)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in ealpha072 Student-Management-System up to 01451bd7a2f58cdda07bd0b86e3967582e3ecd08. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file admin/config.php of the component Administrative Backend. Such manipulation leads to improper authentication. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
A vulnerability was determined in sgl-project SGLang up to 0.5.11. Affected by this vulnerability is the function data_hash of the component Cache Handler. This manipulation causes denial of service. The attack is restricted to local execution. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
Active IQ OneCollect version 2.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
Active IQ Config Advisor version 6.7.3 contains hard-coded credentials that could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to perform unauthorized AutoSupport operations.
A vulnerability was found in crmeb crmeb_java 1.4. Affected is the function RestTemplate.getForEntity of the file crmeb-common/src/main/java/com/zbkj/common/utils/RestTemplateUtil.java of the component base64 Qrcode Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.