Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PwC US ConsultingPwC US Consulting
VS
MercerMercer
PwC US Consulting

PwC US Consulting

N/A

Last Update: 25/12/2025

View Profile
758/1000Fair

Preparing for tomorrow's workforce, today. At PwC, we help clients transform their businesses today in order to thrive tomorrow. As we all experience fundamental shifts in the way we work, our team is taking a holistic approach that encompasses business strategy, as wel...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:79
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mercer

Mercer

New York, New York, New York, 10036, US

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile

At Mercer, A Marsh business, we’re helping our clients realize their investment objectives, shape the future of work, and enhance health and retirement outcomes for their people. As a business of Marsh, for 80 years, we’ve been helping our clients, colleagues and comm...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:22,066
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PwC US Consulting

PwC US Consulting

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mercer

Mercer

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PwC US Consulting in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mercer in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PwC US Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PwC US Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mercer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mercer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PwC US Consulting

PwC US Consulting

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mercer

Mercer

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FIDLPLAMEMER1779194480

FAQ

Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PwC US Consulting company and Mercer company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PwC US Consulting and Mercer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PwC US Consulting and Mercer, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PwC US Consulting or Mercer ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PwC US Consulting or Mercer ?
Between PwC US Consulting and Mercer, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PwC US Consulting and Mercer, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3