Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PwC Tech EffectPwC Tech Effect
VS
SwecoSweco
PwC Tech Effect

PwC Tech Effect

N/A

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

From our deep knowledge on unlocking value with AI, to emerging technology and transformation, PwC is helping clients turn complexity into competitive advantage at scale. We are continuing to raise the bar on quality across all three lines of service—Advisory, Assurance...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:56
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Sweco

Sweco

Gjörwellsgatan 22, Stockholm, 112 60, SE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.swecogroup.com/
773/1000Fair

Sweco is at the heart of the green transition - planning and designing the sustainable communities and cities of the future. Together with our clients and the collective knowledge of our 23,000 architects, engineers and other specialists, we co-create solutions to addre...

NAICS:54
NAICS Definition:Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Employees:22,012
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PwC Tech Effect

PwC Tech Effect

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sweco

Sweco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PwC Tech Effect in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Professional Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sweco in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PwC Tech Effect (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PwC Tech Effect cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sweco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sweco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PwC Tech Effect

PwC Tech Effect

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Sweco

Sweco

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PwC Tech Effect company and Sweco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PwC Tech Effect and Sweco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PwC Tech Effect and Sweco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PwC Tech Effect or Sweco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PwC Tech Effect or Sweco ?
Between PwC Tech Effect and Sweco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PwC Tech Effect and Sweco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8