Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PwC RussiaPwC Russia
VS
Western UnionWestern Union
PwC Russia

PwC Russia

Butyrsky Val, 10, Moscow, 125047, RU

Last Update: 18/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pwc.ru
757/1000Fair

PwC is the leading professional services organization in the world, ranking first or second in every market it operates. Drawing on the talents of more than 195,000 people in 157 countries we bring together unmatched professional knowledge and practical experience. ...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:509
Subsidiaries:56
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Western Union

Western Union

7001 E Belleview, Denver, CO, US, 80237

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.westernunion.com
735/1000Moderate

Many know us as the most trusted way to send money to friends and family overseas and across borders, but we're much more than that. Our talented teams around the world are building new ways to send, save and spend money. Wherever you are in the world, in whatever cur...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,263
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PwC Russia

PwC Russia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Western Union

Western Union

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PwC Russia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Western Union in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PwC Russia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PwC Russia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Western Union (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Western Union cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PwC Russia

PwC Russia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Western Union

Western Union

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WES838072925
🔒 Incident : Breach
WES10197622

FAQ

Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PwC Russia company and Western Union company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PwC Russia and Western Union, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PwC Russia and Western Union, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PwC Russia or Western Union ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PwC Russia or Western Union ?
Between PwC Russia and Western Union, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PwC Russia and Western Union, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89322
SUMMARY

Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-107314
SUMMARY

pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107285
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107284
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107283
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2