Comparison Overview

PwC India

VS

ZS

PwC India

Sector V, Salt Lake, Kolkata, West Bengal, 700091, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.pwc.in

At PwC, our purpose is to build trust in society and solve important problems. We’re a network of firms in 151 countries with over 360,000 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, advisory and tax services. Find out more and tell us what matters to you by visiting us at www.pwc.com. In India, our highly qualified and experienced professionals listen to different points of view to help you solve business issues and identify and maximise the opportunities you seek. Our industry specialisation allows us to help co-create solutions with our clients for their sector of interest. PwC has offices in these cities: Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Bhopal, Bhubaneswar, Chennai, Dehradun, Delhi NCR, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kolkata, Mumbai, Patna, Pune and Raipur.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 23,833
Subsidiaries: 79
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ZS

1560 Sherman Avenue, Evanston, IL, US, 60201
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zs.com

ZS is a management consulting and technology firm that partners with companies to improve life and how we live it. We transform ideas into impact by bringing together data, science, technology and human ingenuity to deliver better outcomes for all. Founded in 1983, ZS has more than 13,000 employees in over 35 offices worldwide. To learn more, visit www.zs.com/ At ZS, our mission is to inspire each other to bring our unique perspective and experience to work each day. When you join our firm, you have access to a wealth of community groups to support you, energize you and inspire you to bring your authentic self to work each day.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 18,004
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pwc-india.jpeg
PwC India
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zs-associates.jpeg
ZS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PwC India
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ZS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PwC India in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZS in 2025.

Incident History — PwC India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PwC India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ZS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pwc-india.jpeg
PwC India
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zs-associates.jpeg
ZS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PwC India company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ZS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ZS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PwC India company.

In the current year, ZS company and PwC India company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ZS company nor PwC India company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ZS company nor PwC India company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ZS company nor PwC India company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PwC India company nor ZS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PwC India nor ZS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

PwC India company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ZS company.

PwC India company employs more people globally than ZS company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither PwC India nor ZS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PwC India nor ZS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PwC India nor ZS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PwC India nor ZS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PwC India nor ZS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PwC India nor ZS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References