Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PVHBA BusinesswearPVHBA Businesswear
VS
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.
PVHBA Businesswear

PVHBA Businesswear

3-7 McPherson St, Sydney, 2019, AU

Last Update: 29/12/2025

View Profile
763/1000Fair

PVH Brands Australia Businesswear [PVHBA Businesswear] provides quality corporate and smart casual clothing that will enhance your image and differentiate your brand. With an exclusive portfolio of international and national trusted brands, PVH Brands Australia Busines...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Piramal Agastya Corporate Park, Building 'A', 4th and 5th Floor, Unit No. 401, 403, 501, 502, L.B.S. Road, Kurla, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400070

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abfrl.com/
763/1000Fair

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited (ABFRL), part of the Aditya Birla Group, is India’s leading fashion powerhouse, offering a distinguished portfolio of renowned brands and retail formats, catering to multiple high-growth segments. As of March 31, 2025, the Compan...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:14,033
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PVHBA Businesswear

PVHBA Businesswear

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PVHBA Businesswear in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PVHBA Businesswear (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PVHBA Businesswear cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PVHBA Businesswear

PVHBA Businesswear

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear company and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PVHBA Businesswear or Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PVHBA Businesswear or Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd. ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PVHBA Businesswear and Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2