Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Pure StoragePure Storage
VS
ReplyReply
Pure Storage

Pure Storage

2555 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95054

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
537/1000Critical

Pure Storage (NYSE: PSTG) uncomplicates data storage, forever. Pure delivers a cloud experience that empowers every organization to get the most from their data while reducing the complexity and expense of managing the infrastructure behind it. Pure’s commitment to prov...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:7,087
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Reply

Reply

C.so Francia, 110, Turin, 10143, IT

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.reply.com
764/1000Fair

Reply [EXM, STAR: REY] specialises in the design and implementation of solutions based on new communication channels and digital media. As a network of highly specialised companies, Reply defines and develops business models enabled by the new models of AI, big data, cl...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:16,816
Subsidiaries:117
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Pure Storage

Pure Storage

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Reply

Reply

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pure Storage in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reply in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Pure Storage (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pure Storage cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Reply (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reply cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Pure Storage

Pure Storage

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PUR4402144112025
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PUR0732107102525
Reply

Reply

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Pure Storage company and Reply company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Pure Storage and Reply, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Pure Storage and Reply, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Pure Storage or Reply ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Pure Storage or Reply ?
Between Pure Storage and Reply, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Pure Storage and Reply, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA