Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Purdue University Daniels School of BusinessPurdue University Daniels School of Business
VS
University of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh
Purdue University Daniels School of Business

Purdue University Daniels School of Business

100 S. Grant Street, Suite 2020, West Lafayette, IN, US, 47906

Last Update: 25/03/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

The Mitch Daniels School of Business at Purdue University is for those who have eyes on the future, who thrive at the intersection of business and technology, who believe a strong business education requires a STEM foundation. We are building the future of business. We ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:609
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Pittsburgh

University of Pittsburgh

4200 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, US, 15260

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

The University of Pittsburgh is a top-ranked, public institution in Pennsylvania and a member of the Association of American Universities of leading research universities. With our discoveries, we are recognized as one of the most innovative universities in the world. W...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:19,281
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Purdue University Daniels School of Business

Purdue University Daniels School of Business

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Pittsburgh

University of Pittsburgh

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Purdue University Daniels School of Business in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Pittsburgh in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Purdue University Daniels School of Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Purdue University Daniels School of Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Pittsburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Pittsburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Purdue University Daniels School of Business

Purdue University Daniels School of Business

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Pittsburgh

University of Pittsburgh

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UNI3617423

FAQ

Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business company and University of Pittsburgh company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business and University of Pittsburgh, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business and University of Pittsburgh, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Purdue University Daniels School of Business or University of Pittsburgh ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Purdue University Daniels School of Business or University of Pittsburgh ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business and University of Pittsburgh, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Purdue University Daniels School of Business and University of Pittsburgh, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1