Comparison Overview

PUMA Group

VS

JCPenney

PUMA Group

PUMA Way 1, Herzogenaurach, DE, 91074
Last Update: 2026-01-20

PUMA is one of the world’s leading sports brands, designing, developing, selling and marketing footwear, apparel and accessories. For more than 75 years, PUMA has relentlessly pushed sport and culture forward by creating fast products for the world’s fastest athletes. PUMA offers performance and sport-inspired lifestyle products in categories such as Football, Running and Training, Basketball, Golf, and Motorsports. It collaborates with renowned designers and brands to bring sport influences into street culture and fashion. The PUMA Group owns the brands PUMA, Cobra Golf and stichd. The company operates in more than 120 countries, employs around 22,000 people worldwide, and is headquartered in Herzogenaurach/Germany.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 21,972
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

JCPenney

6502 Legacy Drive, Plano, 75024, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 800 and 849

As we reinvent ourselves to fit the diversity of America, we are looking for motivated, talented people who can emerge as Warriors in our organization. JCPenney offers an inclusive environment and culture where you can find and define yourself - your style, your purpose and your career. We know success is built from the inside out, and our associates are the heartbeat of our Company! JCPenney is now part of Catalyst Brands.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 40,106
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/puma.jpeg
PUMA Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jcpenney.jpeg
JCPenney
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PUMA Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JCPenney
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PUMA Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JCPenney in 2026.

Incident History — PUMA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PUMA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JCPenney (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JCPenney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/puma.jpeg
PUMA Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jcpenney.jpeg
JCPenney
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2016
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malicious Software
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2016
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

JCPenney company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PUMA Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

JCPenney company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to PUMA Group company.

In the current year, JCPenney company and PUMA Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JCPenney company nor PUMA Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both JCPenney company and PUMA Group company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

JCPenney company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while PUMA Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither PUMA Group company nor JCPenney company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PUMA Group nor JCPenney holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

JCPenney company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PUMA Group company.

JCPenney company employs more people globally than PUMA Group company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither PUMA Group nor JCPenney holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PUMA Group nor JCPenney holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PUMA Group nor JCPenney holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PUMA Group nor JCPenney holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PUMA Group nor JCPenney holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PUMA Group nor JCPenney holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.