Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Public Sector Fraud AuthorityPublic Sector Fraud Authority
VS
South African Revenue Service (SARS)South African Revenue Service (SARS)
Public Sector Fraud Authority

Public Sector Fraud Authority

N/A

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

The Public Sector Fraud Authority (PSFA) launched in August 2022 to bring together experts from across sectors in an integrated way with Cabinet Office and HM Treasury. We put a greater focus on performance and outcomes, as well as build deeper and broader expert-led se...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:28
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
South African Revenue Service (SARS)

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Lehae La Sars, Pretoria, 0001, ZA

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sars.gov.za
795/1000Fair

Its main functions are to: collect and administer all national taxes, duties and levies; collect revenue that may be imposed under any other legislation, as agreed on between SARS and an organ of state or institution entitled to the revenue; provide protection a...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:11,341
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Public Sector Fraud Authority

Public Sector Fraud Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
South African Revenue Service (SARS)

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Public Sector Fraud Authority in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South African Revenue Service (SARS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Public Sector Fraud Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Public Sector Fraud Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - South African Revenue Service (SARS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South African Revenue Service (SARS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Public Sector Fraud Authority

Public Sector Fraud Authority

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
South African Revenue Service (SARS)

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Public Sector Fraud Authority or South African Revenue Service (SARS) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Public Sector Fraud Authority or South African Revenue Service (SARS) ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Public Sector Fraud Authority and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1