Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Greene King Pub PartnersGreene King Pub Partners
VS
TUITUI
Greene King Pub Partners

Greene King Pub Partners

Westgate Brewery, Bury St Edmunds, IP33 1QT, GB

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
776/1000Fair

At Greene King Pub Partners, we like to think we’re the first choice for entrepreneurs. We’re looking to recruit people to work with us, not for us. Because we believe that every partnership begins with you. We will help you make your mark and be at the heart of your...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TUI

TUI

Karl-Wiechert Allee 23, Hannover, Lower Saxony, DE, 30625

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tuigroup.com
817/1000Good

We’re adventure seekers. Smile givers. Impact makers. We believe in the power of travel. It broadens horizons for our customers, and for our people too. New places to live, new roles to explore, new communities to join. It’s yours for the taking. We’re TUI, a leading...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:34,857
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Greene King Pub Partners

Greene King Pub Partners

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TUI

TUI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greene King Pub Partners in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TUI in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Greene King Pub Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greene King Pub Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TUI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TUI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Greene King Pub Partners

Greene King Pub Partners

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TUI

TUI

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners company and TUI company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners and TUI, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners and TUI, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Greene King Pub Partners or TUI ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Greene King Pub Partners or TUI ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners and TUI, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Greene King Pub Partners and TUI, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2