Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mathcad, a PTC TechnologyMathcad, a PTC Technology
VS
Pitney BowesPitney Bowes
Mathcad, a PTC Technology

Mathcad, a PTC Technology

N/A

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ptc.co/pUyG50Qwn0Y
754/1000Fair

Mathcad, a PTC Technology, is the single solution for solving, analyzing, and sharing your most vital engineering calculations.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Pitney Bowes

Pitney Bowes

27 Waterview Dr, Shelton, 06484, US

Last Update: 29/04/2026

View Profile
475/1000Critical

Pitney Bowes is a technology-driven company that provides digital shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the world – including more than 90 percent of the Fortune 500. Small businesses to large enterprises, and government entiti...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:12,782
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mathcad, a PTC Technology

Mathcad, a PTC Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pitney Bowes

Pitney Bowes

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mathcad, a PTC Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Pitney Bowes has 183.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Mathcad, a PTC Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mathcad, a PTC Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pitney Bowes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pitney Bowes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mathcad, a PTC Technology

Mathcad, a PTC Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Pitney Bowes

Pitney Bowes

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
INDPITCARBASZARHAL1777466463
🔒 Incident : Breach
PIT1777335822
🔒 Incident : Breach
CARHOLPRI1776630318

FAQ

Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology company and Pitney Bowes company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology and Pitney Bowes, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology and Pitney Bowes, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mathcad, a PTC Technology or Pitney Bowes ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mathcad, a PTC Technology or Pitney Bowes ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology and Pitney Bowes, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mathcad, a PTC Technology and Pitney Bowes, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA