Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PT DJARUMPT DJARUM
VS
PT HM Sampoerna Tbk.PT HM Sampoerna Tbk.
PT DJARUM

PT DJARUM

Jl. A. Yani 26-28, Kudus, 59317, ID

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.djarum.com
818/1000Good

At Djarum, we view our people as the foundation of our success. We look for people who have a passion for progress, combined with key qualities of humility, dedication and sincerity. These are the values have enabled us to work harmoniously yet dynamically over the past...

NAICS:3122
NAICS Definition:Tobacco Manufacturing
Employees:18,686
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PT HM Sampoerna Tbk.

PT HM Sampoerna Tbk.

One Pacific Place, Sudirman Central Business District (SCBD), Jakarta, 12190, ID

Last Update: 12/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sampoerna.com
788/1000Fair

Established in 1913, PT Hanjaya Mandala Sampoerna Tbk. (Sampoerna) has been playing a significant part in the tobacco industry for more than a century. As a subsidiary of PT Philip Morris Indonesia (PMID) and an affiliate to Philip Morris International Inc. (PMI) since ...

NAICS:3122
NAICS Definition:Tobacco Manufacturing
Employees:20,373
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PT DJARUM

PT DJARUM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PT HM Sampoerna Tbk.

PT HM Sampoerna Tbk.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Tobacco Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT DJARUM in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Tobacco Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - PT DJARUM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT DJARUM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PT DJARUM

PT DJARUM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PT HM Sampoerna Tbk.

PT HM Sampoerna Tbk.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PT DJARUM company and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PT DJARUM and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PT DJARUM and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PT DJARUM or PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PT DJARUM or PT HM Sampoerna Tbk. ?
Between PT DJARUM and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PT DJARUM and PT HM Sampoerna Tbk., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3