Comparison Overview

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

VS

Aflac

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Prudential Tower, Jakarta, undefined, 12910, ID
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Listening. Understanding. Delivering. At Prudential Indonesia we deliver excellence by consistently innovating, creating new opportunities and growing our business to cater all of our customers'​ needs. With a vision of becoming truly world class, Prudential Indonesia provides quality services and proven track record of market leadership in the country. Working at Prudential Indonesia gives you many opportunities to develop yourself and explore what you’re really capable of, as well as the perfect environment to collaborate, listen and care for others. Ask around. The more you find out about us, the more you’ll learn that we’re an insurance company that understands you. We are here to listen.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 11,783
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aflac

1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, Georgia, US, 31999
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 600 and 649

Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small one, you can provide your employees with the kind of benefits they’d expect from a bigger company, helping your business stand out from the crowd. Hundreds of thousands of businesses across the United States already make Aflac available to their employees—at no direct cost to their company. Choose from a wide range of products that can help your employees with health events—from accidents, to disability, to cancer, to life insurance. Your employees enjoy benefits from Aflac, all employee-paid. Please check out Aflac.com for more information.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 18,036
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prudential-indonesia-pt-prudential-life-assurance-.jpeg
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aflac.jpeg
Aflac
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aflac
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

Aflac has 347.76% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prudential-indonesia-pt-prudential-life-assurance-.jpeg
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aflac.jpeg
Aflac
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Insider Threat (Prior Embezzlement), Physical Theft (Evidence Seizure)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Fraudulent Insurance Claims, Theft of Retirement Funds
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Improving Security Posture, Reducing Support Costs, Enhancing User Experience
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: social engineering
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aflac company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aflac company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aflac company has reported more cyber incidents than Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company.

Neither Aflac company nor Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Aflac company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Aflac company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company nor Aflac company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) nor Aflac holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Aflac company.

Aflac company employs more people globally than Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) nor Aflac holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) nor Aflac holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) nor Aflac holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) nor Aflac holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) nor Aflac holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) nor Aflac holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H