Comparison Overview
Proxmox Server Solutions

Proxmox Server Solutions
Bräuhausgasse 37, Vienna, 1050, AT
Last Update: 20/04/2026
Proxmox delivers the world’s most versatile, enterprise-grade open-source virtualization and security ecosystem. We believe true digital sovereignty starts with the freedom to control your own stack. We empower thousands of organizations across 142 countries to build se...

SAP
Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, Walldorf, 69190, DE
Last Update: 07/10/2026
SAP is a global leader in enterprise applications and business AI. We help organizations run mission-critical operations across finance, procurement, supply chain, human resources, and customer experience -and move from systems that record work to systems that can help ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Proxmox Server Solutions







SAP






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Proxmox Server Solutions in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
SAP has 488.24% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Proxmox Server Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Proxmox Server Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Proxmox Server Solutions

SAP
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.