Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Providence Hospital (Providence Health System)Providence Hospital (Providence Health System)
VS
OSF HealthCareOSF HealthCare
Providence Hospital (Providence Health System)

Providence Hospital (Providence Health System)

1150 Varnum St NE, Washington, 20017, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.provhosp.org
728/1000Moderate

Providence is a 408-bed hospital in Washington, DC with an expert medical staff of more than 500 providers. Located near the Catholic University of America and Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception, our hospital is situated on a 36-acre campus wit...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:369
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
OSF HealthCare

OSF HealthCare

124 SW Adams St, Peoria, 61602, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.osfhealthcare.org
658/1000Weak

OSF HealthCare is an integrated health system founded by The Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis and headquartered in Peoria, Illinois. The system includes 18 inpatient facilities encompassing 16 licensed hospitals, two of which operate dual campuses in separate c...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:12,514
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Providence Hospital (Providence Health System)

Providence Hospital (Providence Health System)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
OSF HealthCare

OSF HealthCare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OSF HealthCare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - OSF HealthCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OSF HealthCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Providence Hospital (Providence Health System)

Providence Hospital (Providence Health System)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PRO000032425
OSF HealthCare

OSF HealthCare

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
OSFCEROSF1766606283
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CEROSF1771973986
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
OSF22412822

FAQ

Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) company and OSF HealthCare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) and OSF HealthCare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) and OSF HealthCare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) or OSF HealthCare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) or OSF HealthCare ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) and OSF HealthCare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Providence Hospital (Providence Health System) and OSF HealthCare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1