Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Providence FoundationsProvidence Foundations
VS
Goodwill Industries InternationalGoodwill Industries International
Providence Foundations

Providence Foundations

2201 Lind Ave SW, Renton, 98057, US

Last Update: 22/01/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

Providence’s family of 40-plus foundations inspire more than 50,000 donors each year across seven Western states to invest in the health of their local communities – driving innovative research, providing state-of-the-art technology, strengthening our health care workfo...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Goodwill Industries International

Goodwill Industries International

15810 Indianola Dr., Rockville, 20855, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.goodwill.org/
785/1000Fair

Goodwill Industries is all about people working. We are North America’s leading nonprofit provider of education, training, and career services for people with disadvantages, such as welfare dependency, homelessness, and lack of education or work experience, as well as ...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:23,174
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Providence Foundations

Providence Foundations

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Goodwill Industries International

Goodwill Industries International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Providence Foundations in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goodwill Industries International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Providence Foundations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Providence Foundations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Goodwill Industries International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goodwill Industries International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Providence Foundations

Providence Foundations

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Goodwill Industries International

Goodwill Industries International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Providence Foundations company and Goodwill Industries International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Providence Foundations and Goodwill Industries International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Providence Foundations and Goodwill Industries International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Providence Foundations or Goodwill Industries International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Providence Foundations or Goodwill Industries International ?
Between Providence Foundations and Goodwill Industries International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Providence Foundations and Goodwill Industries International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2